<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Sony partnership to offer 500K free ePub books</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ireaderreview.com/2009/03/18/google-sony-partnership-to-offer-500k-free-epub-books/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ireaderreview.com/2009/03/18/google-sony-partnership-to-offer-500k-free-epub-books/</link>
	<description>Kindle Review, Kindle Fire Review, New Kindle Review, Kindle 4 Review</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:22:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miller J.</title>
		<link>http://ireaderreview.com/2009/03/18/google-sony-partnership-to-offer-500k-free-epub-books/#comment-10091</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miller J.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ireaderreview.com/?p=2367#comment-10091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Android would advance faster if they opened all the APIs up to C++, so that no knowledge of Java would be required.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Android would advance faster if they opened all the APIs up to C++, so that no knowledge of Java would be required.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Harman</title>
		<link>http://ireaderreview.com/2009/03/18/google-sony-partnership-to-offer-500k-free-epub-books/#comment-2527</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Harman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ireaderreview.com/?p=2367#comment-2527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wouldn&#039;t Google have profited more by either alliancing with Amazon itself or (since they already crawled into bed in many ways with Apple) wait until the Apple release of it&#039;s netbook/ereader in Q4 2009? Then they may have had a shot, but I see the alliance with Sony as going nowhere. Ok. so they offer 500k public domain books to sony readers. Are most if not all of those books already offered by Gutenburg for the Kindle or are well on there way with Manybooks.com or Feedbooks.com? Or, better yet, can I not download the books in pdf from google directly and then easily convert them for my Kindle anyway? This isn&#039;t offering anything exclusive to Sony and therefore won&#039;t really influence the consumers&#039; decisions on which eReader to buy. In my humble opinion, bad move Google. You may gain a quick $20.00 for this deal, but you&#039;ve shut yourself out of the running for the long-term investment which will yield far more profits. You aren&#039;t shaking up the industry, you&#039;re shooting yourself in the foot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t Google have profited more by either alliancing with Amazon itself or (since they already crawled into bed in many ways with Apple) wait until the Apple release of it&#8217;s netbook/ereader in Q4 2009? Then they may have had a shot, but I see the alliance with Sony as going nowhere. Ok. so they offer 500k public domain books to sony readers. Are most if not all of those books already offered by Gutenburg for the Kindle or are well on there way with Manybooks.com or Feedbooks.com? Or, better yet, can I not download the books in pdf from google directly and then easily convert them for my Kindle anyway? This isn&#8217;t offering anything exclusive to Sony and therefore won&#8217;t really influence the consumers&#8217; decisions on which eReader to buy. In my humble opinion, bad move Google. You may gain a quick $20.00 for this deal, but you&#8217;ve shut yourself out of the running for the long-term investment which will yield far more profits. You aren&#8217;t shaking up the industry, you&#8217;re shooting yourself in the foot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

