<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amazon Kindle Ad Patent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ireaderreview.com/2009/07/04/amazon-kindle-ad-patent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ireaderreview.com/2009/07/04/amazon-kindle-ad-patent/</link>
	<description>Kindle Review, Kindle Fire Review, New Kindle Review, Kindle 4 Review</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:22:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Amazon, Apple patented Book, OS Ads &#171; Kindle Review &#8211; Kindle 2 Review, Books</title>
		<link>http://ireaderreview.com/2009/07/04/amazon-kindle-ad-patent/#comment-6949</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Why Amazon, Apple patented Book, OS Ads &#171; Kindle Review &#8211; Kindle 2 Review, Books]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 06:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ireaderreview.com/?p=4441#comment-6949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Why Amazon, Apple patented Book, OS&#160;Ads  Posted on November 5, 2009 by switch11   A few months back Amazon filed a patent for books supported by Advertisements. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why Amazon, Apple patented Book, OS&nbsp;Ads  Posted on November 5, 2009 by switch11   A few months back Amazon filed a patent for books supported by Advertisements. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Wheeler</title>
		<link>http://ireaderreview.com/2009/07/04/amazon-kindle-ad-patent/#comment-4632</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Wheeler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ireaderreview.com/?p=4441#comment-4632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bound-in advertising was common in mass-market paperbacks from the &#039;40s through the &#039;70s, until author/agent outrage eventually killed it. Blown-in ads (similar to blown-in ads in magazines) were slightly less common, but also known in that era. So advertising in books is nothing new, though it has been rare for the last generation.

The placement of those ads on printed-book pages also seems very similar to placement of advertisements in magazines, in particular 19th century &quot;penny dreadfuls&quot; and the like. There would appear to be a vast amount of prior art here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bound-in advertising was common in mass-market paperbacks from the &#8217;40s through the &#8217;70s, until author/agent outrage eventually killed it. Blown-in ads (similar to blown-in ads in magazines) were slightly less common, but also known in that era. So advertising in books is nothing new, though it has been rare for the last generation.</p>
<p>The placement of those ads on printed-book pages also seems very similar to placement of advertisements in magazines, in particular 19th century &#8220;penny dreadfuls&#8221; and the like. There would appear to be a vast amount of prior art here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

