<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mid November Kindle News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ireaderreview.com/2009/11/16/mid-november-kindle-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ireaderreview.com/2009/11/16/mid-november-kindle-news/</link>
	<description>Kindle Review, Kindle Fire Review, New Kindle Review, Kindle 4 Review</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:22:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zeke</title>
		<link>http://ireaderreview.com/2009/11/16/mid-november-kindle-news/#comment-7238</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zeke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ireaderreview.com/?p=7735#comment-7238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve seen a few comments about &quot;‘no way to put the genie back in the bottle’ unless everyone stops giving away news for free&quot; in regards to news content.

Isn&#039;t it going to be (literally) impossible to arrange for everyone to move to paid content? Any move of this sort could be seen as price fixing, which is illegal. You could see a major source, such as the AP, moving to paid conent, but the only way for everyone to do it is with collusion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen a few comments about &#8220;‘no way to put the genie back in the bottle’ unless everyone stops giving away news for free&#8221; in regards to news content.</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t it going to be (literally) impossible to arrange for everyone to move to paid content? Any move of this sort could be seen as price fixing, which is illegal. You could see a major source, such as the AP, moving to paid conent, but the only way for everyone to do it is with collusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

