<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kindle vs iPad Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ireaderreview.com/2010/01/27/kindle-vs-ipad-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ireaderreview.com/2010/01/27/kindle-vs-ipad-review/</link>
	<description>Kindle Review, Kindle Fire Review, New Kindle Review, Kindle 4 Review</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 22:36:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tablets are&#8230; &#171; Flexible Reality</title>
		<link>http://ireaderreview.com/2010/01/27/kindle-vs-ipad-review/#comment-33895</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tablets are&#8230; &#171; Flexible Reality]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 03:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ireaderreview.com/?p=9571#comment-33895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] time soon regardless of the inroads the Kindle,I-Pad,Nook,et al have made in traditional publishing.The vibrant color displays of tablets are harder on the eyes than the e-ink displays used in dedicat...The typical Android powered consumer grade tablet will have a street price under $250 as of the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] time soon regardless of the inroads the Kindle,I-Pad,Nook,et al have made in traditional publishing.The vibrant color displays of tablets are harder on the eyes than the e-ink displays used in dedicat&#8230;The typical Android powered consumer grade tablet will have a street price under $250 as of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: switch11</title>
		<link>http://ireaderreview.com/2010/01/27/kindle-vs-ipad-review/#comment-33814</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[switch11]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2011 23:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ireaderreview.com/?p=9571#comment-33814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Isabel, the word sexy can mean attractive and doesn&#039;t always imply a sexual intent (implicit or explicit).

Like a lot of other words (beautiful, fun, cool, naughty, etc.) - in fact like pretty much any word - the word sexy can be used in a variety of contexts.

If i think a book is beautiful it doesn&#039;t mean I intend to marry it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isabel, the word sexy can mean attractive and doesn&#8217;t always imply a sexual intent (implicit or explicit).</p>
<p>Like a lot of other words (beautiful, fun, cool, naughty, etc.) &#8211; in fact like pretty much any word &#8211; the word sexy can be used in a variety of contexts.</p>
<p>If i think a book is beautiful it doesn&#8217;t mean I intend to marry it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isabel</title>
		<link>http://ireaderreview.com/2010/01/27/kindle-vs-ipad-review/#comment-33812</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Isabel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2011 21:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ireaderreview.com/?p=9571#comment-33812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not sure what you mean by &quot;sexy&quot; ??? I didn&#039;t read anywhere in the review whereby the ipad was dressed in a pink skimpy thong or some other style of erotic alluring attire but to each his own I suppose. Sir, on a future note, stay away from my ipad, seriously! I&#039;d be weary of you trying to [removed] it. LMFAO @ &#039;sexy.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure what you mean by &#8220;sexy&#8221; ??? I didn&#8217;t read anywhere in the review whereby the ipad was dressed in a pink skimpy thong or some other style of erotic alluring attire but to each his own I suppose. Sir, on a future note, stay away from my ipad, seriously! I&#8217;d be weary of you trying to [removed] it. LMFAO @ &#8216;sexy.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: switch11</title>
		<link>http://ireaderreview.com/2010/01/27/kindle-vs-ipad-review/#comment-33450</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[switch11]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 21:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ireaderreview.com/?p=9571#comment-33450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Firstly, I think Kindle is a much better screen for reading when there is light around. So let&#039;s not put words in my mouth.

Secondly, iPad screen = Color + Touch + Readable at Night.
Kindle screen = readable in bright sunlight + better dpi + much better readability + better for the eyes.

So people can pick whatever they want.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firstly, I think Kindle is a much better screen for reading when there is light around. So let&#8217;s not put words in my mouth.</p>
<p>Secondly, iPad screen = Color + Touch + Readable at Night.<br />
Kindle screen = readable in bright sunlight + better dpi + much better readability + better for the eyes.</p>
<p>So people can pick whatever they want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://ireaderreview.com/2010/01/27/kindle-vs-ipad-review/#comment-33440</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 05:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ireaderreview.com/?p=9571#comment-33440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why does iPad win in the screen category if eInk is better for reading? Aren&#039;t we comparing with respect to what&#039;s better as an eReader? Beyond this particular function, iPad does lots of cool things. And I don&#039;t see why touch is even relevant if we&#039;re looking for better reading experience. I really like both, but as an eReader alone, Kindle seems a lot better (the biggest drawback is that it needs light if you&#039;re in the dark -- big drawback with iPad is that you cannot easily read it outside because it gets washed out -- I think those are really the deciding factors if the weight isn&#039;t an issue with respect to what&#039;s better at this particular function).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does iPad win in the screen category if eInk is better for reading? Aren&#8217;t we comparing with respect to what&#8217;s better as an eReader? Beyond this particular function, iPad does lots of cool things. And I don&#8217;t see why touch is even relevant if we&#8217;re looking for better reading experience. I really like both, but as an eReader alone, Kindle seems a lot better (the biggest drawback is that it needs light if you&#8217;re in the dark &#8212; big drawback with iPad is that you cannot easily read it outside because it gets washed out &#8212; I think those are really the deciding factors if the weight isn&#8217;t an issue with respect to what&#8217;s better at this particular function).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: switch11</title>
		<link>http://ireaderreview.com/2010/01/27/kindle-vs-ipad-review/#comment-30926</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[switch11]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 02:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ireaderreview.com/?p=9571#comment-30926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Morgan, ask him to get you the $139 WiFi one now. He might agree to that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Morgan, ask him to get you the $139 WiFi one now. He might agree to that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgan Burr</title>
		<link>http://ireaderreview.com/2010/01/27/kindle-vs-ipad-review/#comment-30922</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morgan Burr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 01:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ireaderreview.com/?p=9571#comment-30922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[how do you get my dad in buying,  kindle tonight but he will let me buy one he just says we will do it another and that doesn&#039;t happen]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how do you get my dad in buying,  kindle tonight but he will let me buy one he just says we will do it another and that doesn&#8217;t happen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgan Burr</title>
		<link>http://ireaderreview.com/2010/01/27/kindle-vs-ipad-review/#comment-30921</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morgan Burr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 01:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ireaderreview.com/?p=9571#comment-30921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think we r dont u]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we r dont u</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: switch11</title>
		<link>http://ireaderreview.com/2010/01/27/kindle-vs-ipad-review/#comment-29577</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[switch11]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 01:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ireaderreview.com/?p=9571#comment-29577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thanks for the suggestions and the comment. It&#039;s a difficult topic to get right.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the suggestions and the comment. It&#8217;s a difficult topic to get right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Cruz Martinez</title>
		<link>http://ireaderreview.com/2010/01/27/kindle-vs-ipad-review/#comment-29576</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Cruz Martinez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 01:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ireaderreview.com/?p=9571#comment-29576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I do like the review, however, you are judging an eReader vs. an iPad. I would only judge them as readers and not as a reader and a multipurpose devise as you are mixing the two up. When you are judging you are including the features of the iPad as mostly that and not just an eReader as that is what I thought the article was about. 

You did include some very important aspects to the article and i found it quite informant!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do like the review, however, you are judging an eReader vs. an iPad. I would only judge them as readers and not as a reader and a multipurpose devise as you are mixing the two up. When you are judging you are including the features of the iPad as mostly that and not just an eReader as that is what I thought the article was about. </p>
<p>You did include some very important aspects to the article and i found it quite informant!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

