<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the efficacy of online advertising, or lack thereof</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ireaderreview.com/2010/03/06/on-the-efficacy-of-onlineadvertising-or-lack-thereof/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ireaderreview.com/2010/03/06/on-the-efficacy-of-onlineadvertising-or-lack-thereof/</link>
	<description>Kindle Review, Kindle Fire Review, New Kindle Review, Kindle 4 Review</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:22:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: switch11</title>
		<link>http://ireaderreview.com/2010/03/06/on-the-efficacy-of-onlineadvertising-or-lack-thereof/#comment-11981</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[switch11]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 19:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ireaderreview.com/?p=10242#comment-11981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[haha. There have been a lot of people writing about how ads are bad and it&#039;s good because hopefully companies begin to figure out that users don&#039;t want ads.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha. There have been a lot of people writing about how ads are bad and it&#8217;s good because hopefully companies begin to figure out that users don&#8217;t want ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://ireaderreview.com/2010/03/06/on-the-efficacy-of-onlineadvertising-or-lack-thereof/#comment-11979</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fred]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 18:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ireaderreview.com/?p=10242#comment-11979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m so tuned out to ads that I&#039;ll tape 30 minute shows to fast forward thru them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so tuned out to ads that I&#8217;ll tape 30 minute shows to fast forward thru them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: giantcat</title>
		<link>http://ireaderreview.com/2010/03/06/on-the-efficacy-of-onlineadvertising-or-lack-thereof/#comment-11963</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[giantcat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 06:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ireaderreview.com/?p=10242#comment-11963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree that adverts are annoying, but the world is not an ideal place...

When it comes to the matter of who pays for what, business are often only guys willing to pay.

We need alternative systems to feed contents providers, because the current advertisement based system potentially have devastating effects on us in many ways. 

It is, however, very hard: Pay-walling everything certainly is one easy solution but that will segregate the poor in network space and offset some of the efforts being made to  dissolve many inequality related problems or, more bluntly put, inequality related costs( which normally increase exponentially as things get worse). 

So, I have a feeling that pay-walling contents might just externalise the problem: which is fine for a business, and one blog charging users won&#039;t have any effects on us. 
The cost of the mass adoption of contents-pay-walling-practice, we can&#039;t measure it but, will it truly be insignificant?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that adverts are annoying, but the world is not an ideal place&#8230;</p>
<p>When it comes to the matter of who pays for what, business are often only guys willing to pay.</p>
<p>We need alternative systems to feed contents providers, because the current advertisement based system potentially have devastating effects on us in many ways. </p>
<p>It is, however, very hard: Pay-walling everything certainly is one easy solution but that will segregate the poor in network space and offset some of the efforts being made to  dissolve many inequality related problems or, more bluntly put, inequality related costs( which normally increase exponentially as things get worse). </p>
<p>So, I have a feeling that pay-walling contents might just externalise the problem: which is fine for a business, and one blog charging users won&#8217;t have any effects on us.<br />
The cost of the mass adoption of contents-pay-walling-practice, we can&#8217;t measure it but, will it truly be insignificant?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

